Only 4.75 Million Join India’s Workforce Annually, Not 12 Million As Claimed
21 May 2018
ABOUT THIS Perspective
On average, 4.75 million people are added to the labour force in India per year, an analysis of labour bureau data over a period of four years from 2012 shows. This is less than half the 12 million that people think enter the labour force on an annual basis.
On average, 4.75 million people are added to the labour force in India per year, an analysis of labour bureau data over a period of four years from 2012 shows.
This is less than half the 12 million that people think enter the labour force on an annual basis.
Entering the labour force means that you are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. India’s labour force was just under 466 million people in 2015.
The labour force participation rate is the total number of employed persons and unemployed persons that are looking for work divided by the total population over 15 years of age.
The total labour force participation rate was 50.3% in 2015, according to the Labour Bureau’s Employment –Unemployment Survey, 2015, down from 52.5% in 2014.
That is, only one out of every two Indians above the age of 15 is either employed or looking for work. At 23.7% in 2015, female labour force participation is even lower, and has been falling for the last decade. (Read here, here and here)
12 million? 5 million?
So, where does the 12 million figure come from? It is true that between 2001 and 2005, on average, roughly 12 million entered the labour force every year. But never since then.
During this period, there was an increase in the share of self-employed in rural and urban areas, as a result of additional employment opportunities that came with a period of economic growth – prompting people to take up contractual employment in sectors such as real estate, construction and in small enterprises.
The subsequent period, 2005 to 2010, saw a drastic decline in the number of people entering the labour force as the female labour force participation declined and a drop in the incidence of casual labour.
The 12 million figure frequently cited is the difference in the average annual change in the size of the total working age population, 15 to 59 year olds, according to UN Population Division estimates between 2011 and 2016.
On average, between 2005 and 2015, just under half a million 15 to 17 year olds joined the working age group annually.
Rise in India’s Working Age Population, 2005 – 2015
Year
Total Population (in million)
Increment in Population (in million)
5 yearly
Annual
2005
69.79
2010
72.63
2.84
0.57
2015
74.62
1.99
0.40
Average
0.48
Source: Author’s calculation based on UN Population Division estimates
And not all of these people of working age choose to enter the labour market. Some may decide to stay in education while others may decide, or be compelled, to neither enter education nor employment (NEET).
The number of NEET youth, aged 15 to 29, was 30.8% in 2015, according to this 2017 India report by OECD Economic Surveys.
Jobs data a big concern
“The lack of reliable estimates on employment in recent years has impeded its measurement and thereby the Government faces challenges in adopting appropriate policy interventions,” chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian wrote in the 2016-2017 Economic Survey.
The survey acknowledged many limitations of India’s labour market data including “partial coverage, inadequate sample size, low frequency, long time lags, double counting, conceptual differences and definitional issues”.
While efforts are underway to gather more data regularly, a year after Subramanian noted the limitations of existing labour market data, it will be some time before there are enough time-series data to properly assess labour market trends.
Answering this basic question correctly – how many people enter India’s labour force every year – is fundamental to addressing the nation’s employment challenge.
That so many answer it incorrectly is symptomatic of another problem – the lack of regular, reliable, and recent labour market data on which to base policy.
The international (International Labour Organization model) estimates of the labour force, however, present a slightly different picture. As per World Development Indicators of the World Bank, India had a total workforce of 503.8 million in 2015. Between 2011-2016, on average, India added 6.6 million to the labour force per year.
Thus, using the Labour Bureau’s estimate of the average number of people being added to the workforce every year (just under five million between 2012 and 2015) and the World Bank’s estimate of the average number of people being added to the workforce every year (just under seven million between 2011 and 2016), one can estimate that roughly 5-7 million people are entering the Indian workforce on an annual basis.
The variation in national and international estimates can be attributed to differences in survey and computation methodology, and varying time periods of estimation that leads to inclusion or exclusion of seasonally employed persons in certain estimates.
Even at 4.75 million, India’s formal economy is not creating enough jobs to absorb those entering the labour market. The economy generated only 7 million jobs during this entire period, whereas 4.75 million were entering the labour force every year, according to this 2017 report by McKinsey Global Institute, a global private sector think-tank set up as the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company.
Getting data right is an imperative to diagnose the scope and scale of India’s jobs challenge and to ultimately and effectively address it.
How does India’s emerging legal framework for gig and platform workers measure up to new global labour standards? In her latest piece for Tech Law Forum, JustJobs Network’s Kaushiki Sanyal examines India’s evolving approach to platform work in light of the ILO’s new Convention on Decent Work in the Platform Economy. She examines what the Convention means for gig workers and where India’s current framework stands on minimum wages, social security, occupational safety, algorithmic transparency, protection against deactivation, and collective rights.
India is investing heavily in skilling. But are employers investing enough in the people they say they cannot find? In her latest piece published in Outlook India, JJN researcher Isha Gupta argues that employers need to become active participants in shaping skills, designing apprenticeships and creating clearer pathways from training to stable employment.
India’s young population has big aspirations, but limited good jobs, skills gaps and informal employment threaten its demographic dividend. Sabina Dewan examines what Indian youth want—and what reality offers.
For migrant farmers cultivating informally rented land in Delhi's Madanpur Khadar, rising temperatures raise the cost of survival. With work depending on access to water, secure land tenure, and access to markets, extreme heat exacerbates these conditions, making long hours of work more difficult and livelihoods more uncertain. This fieldwork account explores how heat is experienced by farmers who fall outside conventional employer-employee relationships, and why heat adaptation must look beyond exposure alone to the wider conditions that shape their ability to work and survive
India’s platform economy is exposing a deeper question about social security: can a welfare system built around occupations protect workers whose jobs, platforms and locations keep changing? JustJobs Network’s Kaushiki Sanyal explores this question in her latest piece for The Policy Edge, examining why India’s welfare-board model is being tested and what a more portable, worker-centred social protection system could look like.
Recent protests over a leaked examination paper have also brought renewed attention to India's employment challenge. In this piece, Shipra Nigam, Research Director at JustJobs Network, writing for The Hindu, argues that the intense competition for government jobs is not simply about a preference for public sector employment. It reflects a deeper issue: while educational attainment has expanded significantly, the economy has not generated enough secure, productive, and dignified jobs for young people.
India's ITI system faces a crisis of relevance, with half its seats lying vacant despite growing demand for skills. This article examines how outdated courses, gender segregation and weak alignment with labour market needs are undermining vocational education, and argues for reforms that make ITIs more inclusive and responsive to today's economy.
India's vocational training system has expanded rapidly, but weak ITIs continue to undermine skill development. This article examines the gaps in training quality, industry linkages and employment outcomes, and outlines the reforms needed to make ITIs a credible pathway to skilled jobs.
In Bhubaneswar's scorching summers, Mamata, a vegetable vendor, restructures her entire day around the heat - working longer hours both at her cart and at home and absorbing the income loss that follows. Her story reveals what's missing from how we talk about informal work and heat: the type of occupation matters. The worksite, the task, and the stability of employment all shape how vulnerable a worker really is - and current heat action plans fail to capture this nuance.
While more young rural women are entering the workforce through skilling programmes, staying in formal employment remains a challenge. Drawing on research by JustJobs Network and PRADAN, this article explores the social, familial, and workplace barriers that shape women’s employment journeys and argues that skills alone are not enough without sustained support, safe migration pathways, and better job quality.
In this article by The Indian Express, India’s young consumers are shown powering demand, tracking credit scores and fuelling a surge in borrowing, even as millions of graduates remain locked out of stable jobs. This widening disconnect, as research from JustJobs Network suggests, raises larger questions about whether the country’s demographic advantage can translate into durable economic gains.
India’s Gender Budget has grown steadily, yet implementation challenges persist. Drawing on fieldwork in Odisha, JJN’s researcher Kripa Krishna examines in her piece for Ideas for India on how weak local capacity, limited accountability, and gaps in last-mile delivery undermine welfare outcomes. It argues that without strengthening public systems and evaluating existing schemes, increased allocations risk falling short of translating into meaningful improvements in women’s economic empowerment.